Two dogs, now gone, showed me how to consider the outdoors. Belle appreciated the landscape as a whole. She stopped, not just at the summit, but to tend to sounds and smells that called to her. On each journey, she paid attention to nuances of flora and fauna. Kip, meanwhile, focused narrowly on the path and on getting somewhere.
I consider people along this same continuum as they interact with the land: some embrace it holistically, with an almost genetic sensitivity to shifts in their surroundings. Others track along, oblivious to phenomena outside their path.
Among them, who are the environmentalists?
If you live in the suburbs or the city, if you’re active on social platforms, if you absorb mainstream media, you might think outdoor recreationalists are the frontrunners in environmentalism (which to me has fiscal, physical, and spiritual considerations).
As a kid growing up in Maine, I thought so, too. Family vacations were spent maintaining sections of the Appalachian Trail. While we flyfished and canoed benevolently near The Forks and Kokadjo, loggers sharing the same remote roads seemed rough, and, to use today’s vernacular, wholly extractive. On the waters off Harpswell, we were ceaselessly dodging lines and buoys set by lobstermen. What a hassle!
As an adult at events like the Outdoor Retailer, for which tens of thousands swarm the Colorado Convention Center, I further embraced the concept of recreationalist as environmental hero and benefactor. What outdoor company or organization doesn’t espouse a protect where we play ethos?
Surfrider Foundation and Protect Our Winters (POW), for example, are big organizations drawing recreationalists to environmentalism. The famous Banff Mountain Film Festival celebrates mountain culture and the environment.
But do recreationalists pay it forward in any meaningful way beyond loyalty to brands like Patagonia and The North Face (which donate millions to environmental causes)?
In the rural West, it’s those working the land – often conservative, Bible-carrying, gun-toting ranchers and farmers – who are doing the most impressive conservation work. After them, it’s gun-and-rod toting hunters and anglers.
This goes against type and it challenges the notion that environmentalists are all left of center. It brings out the ‘conserve’ in conservative.
Generational land wisdom and conservation efforts often sit squarely with agriculturalists. The Partnership of Rangeland Trusts [PORT], which includes farm-and-ranch-focused conservation organizations in nine Western states, has conserved well over more three million acres.
Maggie Hanna is a senior advisor with Colorado Cattlemen’s Agricultural Land Trust [CCALT], a PORT member which has conserved more than 637,000 acres. She’s also a fourth-generation rancher, living within a hundred miles of a million city dwellers. These urbanites are often transient, first-generation recreationalists who may not have long-term, land-centric interests at heart, she said.
Does the mountain biker who just dropped thousands on a full-suspension rig engage in any conservation efforts? Often not. Hanna and her colleagues work to involve non-agriculturalists and admit that “we have to do a better job of educating and sharing our stories,” she said.
Dan Malloy sees it on the water, too. “It’s classic to see the average pro surfer get way more props than the ethical fisherman who is putting thousands and thousands of meals on the table,” said Malloy, who surfed professionally and is an accomplished filmmaker. “Many, many people think of agriculturalists as bad guys. But these guys are not playing. They are not visiting. They are the real environmentalists.”
On the fiscal side, some have proposed recreational taxes or fees to offset the imbalance of public land use. Hunters, anglers, and ranchers all pay. Hikers, bikers, and climbers may not bring home a kill, but isn’t a killer day worth something? Isn’t extracting an experience still extraction?
As the big multi-use season of public lands kicks into high gear, getting to know each other would help. Pete Eschallier, co-owner of Kokopelli Bike & Board, in Cortez, Colorado, loves to see National Forest trails used by all. The other day he passed or was passed by runners, horse riders, and dirt bikers. “I had the warm fuzzies. I was super happy that there was a trail system that everybody was using,” said Eschallier.
Bikers may frighten and endanger horses and cows and as part of the multi-use community, we all could do more outreach and on-trail educating.
Horse and cow manure, lobster buoys and lines – they are just signs of people interacting differently.
Enjoying the outdoors is not about getting your nature fix. It’s not about the elevation gain or the epic selfie. It’s a communion for which you should ask yourself: How did I interact? How can I give back to that which gave me such fulfillment?
Maddy Butcher is the author of “Horse Head: Brain Science & Other Insights” and director of the Best Horse Practices Summit. She lives in southwestern Colorado.
The Colorado Sun is a nonpartisan news organization, and the opinions of columnists and editorial writers do not reflect the opinions of the newsroom. Read our ethics policy for more on The Sun’s opinion policy and submit columns, suggested writers and more to firstname.lastname@example.org.