Democrats in the Colorado legislature on Thursday introduced an 11th-hour bill that seeks to ask voters in November to raise taxes on cigarettes and start taxing other products that contain nicotine.
House Bill 1427 would ask voters to gradually — but significantly — raise the taxes over the next seven fiscal years.
Whereas taxes on a pack of cigarettes are now 84 cents, the bill would ask voters to allow the state to raise that amount to $1.94 starting next year. Starting in July 2024, taxes on a pack of cigarettes would then rise to $2.24 a pack. Then in July 2027 and moving forward, the taxes would be $2.64 a pack.
Nicotine products, including vaping devices and fuel, would be taxed at 30% of their manufacturer’s list price starting next year if voters sign off. By July 2024, that would rise to 56% of the list price. Then in July 2027 and moving forward, the taxes would be 62% of nicotine products’ market list price
Vaping products aren’t currently taxed in Colorado.
The bill was introduced Thursday, a day before the legislature was originally supposed to adjourn after returning for three weeks following a two-month-plus coronavirus pause. It appears lawmaking will stretch into the weekend now in order to accommodate House Bill 1427 and other last-minute legislation.
The legislation is very similar to a proposed ballot measure — Initiative 292 — that would enact a nicotine tax and raise the taxes on cigarettes to 62% of their manufacturer’s list price overnight.
House Bill 1427 has Gov. Jared Polis’ support.
“The governor strongly supports the initiated ballot measure, but it’s undeniable the state’s current revenue challenges requires smart solutions such as this,” Conor Cahill, a spokesman for Polis, said in a written statement. “He would sign the bill based on what’s in the introduced version if the legislature sends it to his desk’’
The tobacco industry is also on coalescing around the measure. Amanda Wheeler, president of the Rocky Mountain Smoke Free Alliance, a vape shop trade organization, said lawmakers and groups pushing for the bill worked with tobacco interests to reach a consensus.
Wheeler said her organization doesn’t believe vaping products should be taxed, but that it realized the way the winds were shifting, which is why being at the table was so important.
“We recognize that taxes are coming,” Wheeler said. “We want to have a voice in that process instead of just having those taxes imposed on us without any kind of input.”
The measure was introduced with such haste that its 43 pages of text hadn’t been posted on the legislature’s website before it was scheduled for its first committee hearing on Thursday afternoon.
Another sign of how fast it was introduced: Despite its wide-ranging impacts, only two people showed up to testify on the bill during the 20-minute hearing. They both advocated for the measure.
“I know that it’s all come kind of fast and furious,” Rep. Yadira Caraveo, a Thornton Democrat who is leading the push for the bill, said during the hearing.
Legislative fiscal analysts believe the proposed tax hike would net the state about $86 million in the 2020-21 fiscal year, which begins in July. In the following fiscal year, the state would collect more than $173 million.
State Rep. Julie McCluskie, a Dillion Democrat and prime sponsor of the bill, said she hopes the bill will help bolster the state’s ailing budget, which has taken a major hit as a result of the coronavirus crisis. At first, revenue generated by the taxes will go toward backfilling the state’s coffers.
After that, revenue from the taxes would be distributed to fund health care, tobacco education, preschool and other programs.
If voters approve the tax increase, it will start being enforced in 2021.
Supporters of the measure say it will help drive down tobacco use.
The bill passed its first hurdle, the House Finance Committee, within about 20 minutes and on a 6-to-5 vote. Republicans voiced opposition to the speed at which it was released.
“We got this bill after we even sat down in here. It’s 43 pages. I just can’t support it right know. It sounds good but I just can’t support it right now,” said Rep. Janice Rich, a Grand Junction Republican.
The bill comes after a similar attempt to ask voters to raise cigarette taxes and enact a nicotine tax last year failed. Democrats in the Colorado Senate rejected the bill in the final days of the 2019 lawmaking term, in part because of concerns that it was regressive.
Last year’s legislation had the support of Polis. The tobacco industry lobbied heavily against the measure.
Updated at 10:02 a.m. on Friday, June 12, 2020: This story has been updated to reflect amendments to House Bill 1427.
Our articles are free to read, but not free to report
Support local journalism around the state.
Become a member of The Colorado Sun today!
The latest from The Sun
- East Troublesome fire evacuees fled in minutes. Now it could be days before they know the fate of their homes.
- Colorado limits gatherings to 10 people from no more than two households as coronavirus spike continues
- Littwin: The headline from the debate is Trump wasn’t a major jerk, but that isn’t the headline he needed
- “We expect an active fire”: Weather is forecast to fuel East Troublesome fire on Friday
- First coronavirus, then an inferno: How schools in the East Troublesome fire’s path are scrambling to keep their students learning