Good midday, Colorado, hope you’re out there enjoying this lingering, exceedingly green spring. Can’t tell you how much a nonscorching May helps set our brains up for a brilliant summer — it’ll be hot zephyrs and xeriscaping on the Front Range soon enough. Sixty degrees in mid-May is a blessing.
And the late season storms are boosting potential runoff as well, as everybody’s weather friend Chris Bianchi shows us:

But of course, much like the playoff saga of your Nuggets and Avalanche, it’s more complicated than that. If somebody’s up, somebody else is likely down, and the map shows southern Colorado facing some trouble in river basins severely impacted by recent years of drought.
So cross your fingers for the Dolores River, for Nate MacKinnon fighting off Dallas clutch-and-grab, and Michael Porter Jr. somehow geo-locating his jump shot. Let’s keep this spring thing going.
On to lots of news, including some literal fish out of water.
TEMP CHECK
CLIMATE
What did the 46-pound carp eat? Most of Arvada.

14
Number of carp over 40 pounds zapped from an Arvada park lake
The entire history of human-introduced invasive species is watermarked with the subtitle, “It seemed like a good idea at the time.”
It’s a variant on the political meme of enthusiastically joining the Leopards Eating Faces Party and waking up surprised to find leopards, well …
Somebody in 1992 thought it was genius to dump bighead carp, native to China, into the lake at Jack B. Tomlinson Park in Arvada, to eat the muck that tends to produce massive algae blooms in summer dog days.
Oh, they ate.

How much did they eat?
Well, state Parks and Wildlife stunned and pulled out a 46-pounder that refused to back away from the omelet station. Thirteen buddies over 40 pounds were tased at the waffle bar, the taco truck and the all-you-can-eat frozen yogurt dispenser.
The state agency was acting on a tip from a startled angler, which seems a bit judgy to us but on balance was probably the right environmental move. The buffet bruisers were inhaling all the food needed to support desirable sport fish and native Colorado species. The 1992 models were supposed to be gone by 1995 when the study ended. They persisted.
Some of the bighead battleships were stunned for removal by a five-course turkey dinner. Others floated to the surface from parks officials electro-shocking the water.

Did state parks get them all? Turns out these out-of-context carp might have skipped sexy time in favor of meal time, eating themselves right into the finals of the Darwin Awards. “The size of the bighead carp removed indicates natural reproduction has most likely not taken place, which was the best-case scenario,” a biologist said.
Here’s the whole motley crew. Not the parks employees — they’re heroes. It’s the fish that nightmares are made of.

Colorado EV sales drop, mirroring national trend

2.5%
percentage point drop in EVs’ share of Colorado sales dropped
Sales of clean fuel vehicles in Colorado slowed in the first quarter of 2024 despite a growing stack of lucrative rebates available, according to the Colorado Auto Dealers Association, though some green economy enthusiasts said overall electric vehicle trends are strong.
Battery-only electric vehicles, the largest category of clean fuel combinations, went a bit soft at a time they’re supposed to be on a steady growth arc Colorado needs in order to reach 940,000 EVs on the road by 2030, a long-stated target. A climbing number of EV sales is crucial to both the ozone cuts needed to get out from under EPA sanctions, and to meet the state’s greenhouse gas reduction goals.
Perhaps extra worrisome is that the drop also came as a number of lucrative, stackable incentives for buying EVs kicked in. Lower-income buyers who qualify can pile up federal, state, Xcel and a special cash-for-clunkers deal to get as much as about $21,000 off a new EV.
Despite the incentives, the share of full battery-electric vehicles newly registered in Colorado dropped to 13.8% for the first quarter of 2024, from 16.3% in the last three months of 2023. The raw number of BEV sales was about 6,600, down from about 8,900 in late 2023. That’s out of total new vehicle registrations of about 48,000.
The drop also diverged from overall vehicle sales in Colorado, which rose 2.8%, slower than national sales growth averages but still welcome to dealers making up for sales lost during the pandemic shutdowns.
Combining the two clean-vehicle categories, battery electric and plug-in electric hybrids, put Colorado’s share at 19% of overall sales so far in 2024, down from 20.4% in late 2023.
The news follows signs of similar soft EV markets in California, always the market and policy leader for car sales, and across the rest of the nation.
We have more on the numbers from the auto dealers, and their implications for Colorado, today at coloradosun.com.
MORE CLIMATE NEWS
HEALTH
It’s bird flu X 2 as state uncovers a new outbreak

70
The approximate number of dairy workers being monitored after potential exposure to bird flu
Let’s start with the bad news first: Colorado’s outbreak of bird flu in dairy cattle has expanded.
On Wednesday of last week, federal officials confirmed a second instance of bird flu, or highly pathogenic avian influenza, in a dairy herd in Colorado. The state Department of Agriculture said the herd is in northeastern Colorado, the same general location as the first herd in the state to be struck by bird flu. But the state is still investigating to figure out whether there is a connection between the herds — remember, dairy cows move around a surprising amount — or if this new outbreak originated from another source.
Olga Robak, a spokeswoman for the Colorado Department of Agriculture, said the new outbreak was found after cows in the herd showed signs of illness. But it took two weeks before the U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed the outbreak because its lab is so backed up.
As Robak tells it, in an email to The Sun, this delay didn’t have any impact on the state’s response because there’s a two-step process to confirm bird flu cases. First, the state submits test samples to a National Animal Health Laboratory Network facility in Fort Collins at Colorado State University.
In this case, that happened April 24, and the lab returned a “presumptive positive” result the following day. The test results are then sent to the USDA to confirm. But, in the meantime, state officials launched their containment efforts to try to keep the virus from spreading outside the affected herd, Robak wrote in her email.
So bird flu is still going moo in Colorado. But here’s the good news: Unless you own a dairy farm, it doesn’t seem to be affecting you.
The state has reported no human cases of bird flu, at least none since a worker on a poultry farm tested positive two years ago in the first known human case of bird flu in the U.S.
The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment revealed during a virtual town hall meeting last week that it is monitoring approximately 70 dairy workers who were possibly exposed to bird flu. But a department spokesperson said this week that so far none have shown signs of illness, meaning they don’t meet the criteria to be tested.
In addition, the state’s flu surveillance system isn’t picking up any unusual activity. The state isn’t seeing any spikes or local blips in hospitalizations for flu or emergency visits for flu-like illness. Wastewater data, which can potentially detect viruses that are spreading without causing severe illness, is quiet.
As a reminder, there’s been no detection of bird flu spreading person-to-person while this current strain is circulating. Dairy cattle that get sick are not dying. Beef seems to be safe. And milk, while it can get virus in it, is not a concern so long as it’s pasteurized.
Things could of course still turn — as we’ve written before, viruses have a way of surprising, especially if given a lot of runway to mutate — but so far this is mooooving in the right direction. (Sorry.)
MORE HEALTH NEWS
CHART OF THE WEEK

You might glance at a poll on general sentiments about climate change news and think, hmmm, attitudes haven’t changed that much in recent years. And that would be true, judging from the latest installment of an ongoing Gallup Poll topic, above.
But a typical self-doubting environment reporter, who spends a good amount of their time on climate issues, might see another pattern: A big majority of the public is either satisfied with the current tone of news reporting, or wants even more emphasis on climate change. The most recent total of those two numbers is 62%.
Yes, that leaves 37% of folks thinking climate change news is exaggerated. So don’t worry, we’ll stay humble on the topic.
There’s so much we don’t know — thanks for sticking with us while we keep asking.
Thanks for sharing the news cycle with us. Take a note from the waning attention spans in our public schools and make your own personal Field Day sometime this week, if only for a stroll next to a creek. Green is good for the brain.
Cheers.
— Michael & John
Corrections & Clarifications
Notice something wrong? The Colorado Sun has an ethical responsibility to fix all factual errors. Request a correction by emailing corrections@coloradosun.com.



