Two conservative activists with access to a deep well of funding from hidden donors filed 11 ballot initiatives with Legislative Council Staff in recent days that would, among other things, require voter approval for new fees, increase criminal penalties around fentanyl and require state and local law enforcement to work with federal immigration agents.
The measures were submitted by Michael Fields, who leads the conservative political nonprofit Advance Colorado, and Suzanne Taheri, a Republican lawyer who formerly served as Colorado’s deputy secretary of state.
Remember: Submitting a ballot initiative to Legislative Council Staff is the first in a string of steps to get a measure on the ballot. Proposals then must be vetted by the state’s Title Board, and then proponents must gather some 125,000 voter signatures to make the ballot. For measures amending the constitution, those signatures must include at least 2% of the total voters in each of Colorado’s 35 state senate districts.
Keep in mind these initiatives would be for the 2026 election.
The initiatives filed by Fields and Taheri were:
Welcome to The Unaffiliated, the politics and policy newsletter from The Colorado Sun. Each week, we take you inside the political arena to deliver news and insights on Colorado politics. Keep reading for even more exclusive news.
If you’re reading this newsletter but not signed up for it, here’s how to get it sent directly to your email inbox. Please send feedback and tips to jesse@coloradosun.com.
INITATIVES AS A NEGOTIATING TOOL
In a news release this week, Fields hinted that the measures are aimed at prompting legislative action. It’s a playbook he’s used before with success on property taxes.
“We urge the legislature to pass a law mirroring our ballot measure so that Colorado statute mandates cooperation with federal authorities to detain and deport violent criminals and repeat felons who endanger our communities and families,” Fields said in a written statement. “It shouldn’t be optional to take criminals who are here illegally out of our state. It should be mandatory.”
Democrats in the legislature in recent years have passed laws prohibiting state and local law enforcement in Colorado from assisting federal immigration agents beyond the scope of their criminal investigations. They’re unlikely to budge given the Trump administration’s mass deportation plans.
Fields declined to comment further on any of the measures he filed.
These measures are probably just Fields’ opening salvo. We’re a long way out from 2026.
OTHER BALLOT MEASURES
A few other notable ballot measures have been filed with Legislative Council Staff.
THE NARRATIVE
The curious case of TABOR’s vanishing people
Nearly 24,000 Coloradans are set to disappear from the state’s population this year — at least as far as the state budget is concerned.
It’s no mere illusion.
The vanishing act will have real consequences for public services, to the tune of $77 million in required cuts, if lawmakers don’t take action to prevent it.
The issue dates all the way back to when the legislature first implemented the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights in 1993, the year after voters added it to the state constitution.
Obligatory TABOR refresher: The state constitution generally limits state revenue to the combined rate of consumer inflation and population growth. TABOR requires the state to use U.S. Census Bureau estimates to determine the population, but the legislature ultimately decides exactly how the growth rate should be calculated.
For the past 32 years, the state has used a formula that leads to undercounts in some years and overcounts in others, a Colorado Legislative Council staff analysis found. And it doesn’t necessarily even out.
Next budget year, the formula will result in the state losing 24,000 people to an undercount, trimming the TABOR growth rate by 0.4 percentage points. That has the Joint Budget Committee considering a once-in-a-generation change to how the state calculates the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights revenue cap.
The current calculation, said Rep. Shannon Bird, a Westminster Democrat and vice chair of the JBC, “isn’t really reflective of reality.”
Math warning: We’re going to walk you through the numbers, so bear with us for a second.
Each December, the Census Bureau releases new estimates for what the population was on July 1 of any given year. So for 2024, Colorado had an estimated population of 5,957,493.
The 2023 population estimate used in last year’s TABOR cap was 5,877,610. So from one budget year to the next, the population grew by 79,883 people, or 1.4%.
That’s the rate the JBC wants to use in next year’s budget. But that’s not how population growth is calculated under state law today.
Each December, the Census Bureau tries to correct mistakes from previous years. Under the most recent estimates, the state’s population was actually 5,901,339 in 2023 — about 24,000 more than last year’s estimate. That means that from 2023 to 2024, the state’s population only grew by 56,154 people — a 1% growth rate for TABOR purposes.
On the surface, that seems like a reasonable way to calculate growth. After all, why wouldn’t you use the most current estimates available?
The problem is, the state can’t go back and correct this year’s TABOR cap to reflect higher growth. Colorado didn’t get credit for those 24,000 people in this year’s budget, because the cap was set with the smaller estimate from December 2023. And it won’t get credit for them in next year’s budget either, because the state’s population is growing off the new, higher population estimate.
“I actually think the 1% (growth rate under current law) is a better reflection of how much Colorado’s population grew in 2024,” Greg Sobetski, the chief economist for Colorado Legislative Council staff, told the JBC this week. “The issue is that the 1% misses people who ought to have been included in the count of Colorado’s population in 2023. They weren’t, and our current methodology never lets them be counted at all.”
In other words, unless state law changes, TABOR will make those 24,000 people disappear.
Want to reach Colorado political influencers and support quality local journalism? The Sun can help get your message attention through a sponsorship of The Unaffiliated, the must-read politics and policy newsletter in Colorado. Contact Sylvia Harmon at underwriting@coloradosun.com for more information.
THE POLITICAL TICKER
MICHAEL BENNET
U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet, a Colorado Democrat who isn’t up for reelection until 2028, sent out a fundraising email Wednesday night touting his questioning of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a confirmation hearing for Trump’s pick to lead the Department of Health and Human Services.
“I pressed RFK Jr. on his long history of spouting conspiracy theories, which is disqualifying for anyone seeking public office, but especially for someone nominated to be the highest health official in America,” Bennet wrote in the email. “If you stand with common sense and against RFK Jr.’s conspiracy theories, please stand with me today. I’m doing everything in my power to make sure he does not become our next Secretary of Health and Human Services.”
COLORADO GOP
The Colorado GOP central committee meeting Thursday night was nothing short of a cluster.
Chairman Dave Williams called the meeting to vote on a number of party bylaw amendments aimed at making it easier for the party to endorse candidates and opt out of the state’s primary elections, as well as make it harder to remove party officers. The proposals drew a major rebuke from the four Republicans in the state’s congressional delegation, who accused Williams of being “divisive” and attempting to consolidate power.
The gathering was held virtually over Zoom, and immediately drew a parliamentary challenge.
A central committee member complained that the party’s meeting rules were violated because the government-issued ID’s of participants weren’t checked as required. Williams rejected the challenge, but, on appeal, the central committee narrowly voted to overrule the chairman, at which point he abruptly ended the meeting after an hour and a half.
Before the meeting ended, Williams clashed with U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert and state Rep. Ron Weinberg. Williams accused his opponents of trying to disrupt the gathering and played down the parliamentary challenge.
ELECTION 2026
State Rep. Manny Rutinel says his campaign to represent Colorado’s 8th Congressional District raised $400,000 in its first 24 hours this week from more than 4,000 individual donors.
Rutinel also announced a number of endorsements, including from:
READ MORE
🔑 = source has article meter or paywall
COLORADO LEGISLATURE
Where things stand with the Labor Peace Act bill
Gov. Jared Polis has made it clear that Senate Bill 5, the Labor Peace Act measure, is a nonstarter as introduced. But what’s unclear is whether the Colorado labor movement is willing to amend the legislation to get it to a place where Polis may be willing to sign it.
Senate Bill 5 would eliminate a requirement that 75% of workers at a company sign off before a union can negotiate with an employer on union security, which is when workers are forced to pay collective bargaining representation fees regardless of their union participation. Business groups are fighting the change.
Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriguez, a Denver Democrat and a lead sponsor of the measure, said “there are some conversations happening” between proponents of the bill, but that “formal offers have not been (made) at this point.”
“I’m optimistic that at least conversations have started happening,” he said.
Rogridguez said the governor’s office has not been involved with his discussions with the business community. He said Polis’ representatives told him the two sides should work it out among themselves.
“Where we’ll get to is what both sides are probably going to hate, which is sometimes a good thing,” Rodriguez said. “I don’t know that anything that’s offered will even get the governor (to a point where he could sign it).”
The governor has said he’s open to reducing the 75% threshold, but Rodriguez said it’s not clear to him that the labor movement would be willing to go there in exchange for dropping the union security vote altogether.
THE BIGGER PICTURE
🔑 = source has article meter or paywall
The Colorado Sun is part of The Trust Project. Read our policies.
Corrections & Clarifications
Notice something wrong? The Colorado Sun has an ethical responsibility to fix all factual errors. Request a correction by emailing corrections@coloradosun.com.