The Westminster clock tower overlooking Westminster City Hall at the corner of 92nd and Yates Drive.

This story first appeared in a Colorado Community Media newspaper. Support CCM’s neighborhood news. The Colorado Sun is an owner of CCM.

Even though Westminster City Council voted 5-1 against the city’s recommendations for 2022 water rates, the six-member council is split on fundamental ideas on which the city’s plan for utilities is based.

The even split on council over water rates has been publicly known for months, but councilors haven’t articulated the depths of their disagreements like they did at a June 21 study session. Instead of differing over percentages of water rate increases, councilors dispute the actual utilities infrastructure the city says the community needs.

The entire council, except for Mayor Anita Seitz, voted against the city’s recommendations to increase water rates in 2022 by 3.9 percent and sewer rates by 5.5. percent at a June 14 meeting.

However, at the June 21 study session, Seitz and Councilors Kathryn Skulley and Jon Voelz said they agree with the overall direction that the city’s utilities is headed. Mayor Pro Tem David DeMott and Councilors Lindsey Smith and Rich Seymour said the opposite.

The June 21 study session discussion was about alternatives to the recently rejected rate recommendations, but the conversation quickly became about deeper disagreements. DeMott said, “I’ve talked to enough people and been in this community long enough to know that some people who think that the prior administrations and the prior leadership did take care of the system and did plan ahead, question whether or not we need a plant. I have uncomfortable feelings about where we are even going in the direction.”

MORE: Read more politics and government coverage from The Colorado Sun.

Westminster’s highest utility priority is replacing the Semper Water Treatment Facility, or what the city has dubbed Water2025. Originally, the city was considering recommending higher rates to council than the 3.9 percent and 5.5 percent increases to finance a longer list of capital improvement plan projects.

Council directed city staff to lower the recommendations, so staff deferred several CIP projects. The maneuver lowered the recommendations, but still enabled the city to generate enough revenue for Water2025.

Even though council rejected the 3.9 percent and 5.5 percent increases, the city is still set on meeting the same revenue projections. City Manager Don Tripp said at the study session, “I am working off the assumption that we have the revenue right.”

Read more at,