The Colorado Capitol building. (Colorado Public Radio file photo)
The Unaffiliated โ€” All politics, no agenda.

Governments in Colorado would have longer to fulfill citizen requests for public records under legislation that passed its first committee vote last week. News media would get preferential treatment, which caused one lawmaker to vote against the measure.

Colorado Capitol News Alliance

This story was produced as part of the Colorado Capitol News Alliance. It first appeared at cpr.org.

The need to extend deadlines for responding to records requests stems from complaints from school boards and counties that claim voluminous requests for records crowd out work on other core services.

โ€œAs we know money is in short supply around all of our governmental entities,โ€ said state Sen. Cathy Kipp, D-Fort Collins, a prime sponsor of the measure. โ€œAnd we really felt that there was some relief that needed to be done in order to give people a little bit more breathing room in fulfilling these requests.โ€

This is Kippโ€™s second try in as many years to make significant changes to the Colorado Open Records Act, known as CORA. Last year, a similar bill failed due to concerns from disability advocates, the media and parents of public school students. That bill would have labeled certain citizens as โ€œvexatious requestors,โ€ denying timely access to records.

This year’s measure, Senate Bill 77, has removed the โ€œvexatious requestorโ€ elements, and Kipp has added provisions that she said will benefit records requestors as well, like requiring most governments to accept credit card payments for records.

โ€œI think we have achieved some really fair language to give relief to both sides and make this a better law going forward,โ€ Kipp said at a hearing in front of the Senate State, Veterans and Military Affairs committee.

State Sen. Cathy Kipp, D-Fort Collins. (Handout)

Currently, records custodians must respond to requests for documents within three days, and in extenuating circumstances, seven days. Senate Bill 77 would make those deadlines five days and 10 days respectively. The news media would be exempted, and would get records under the shorter deadlines.

In reality, the public has little recourse now when governments exceed those deadlines. That wonโ€™t change under Kippโ€™s bill.

Kipp wanted to โ€œmake sure that we were giving access to people who are legitimate members of the media, and not just somebody who’s got a blog somewhere.โ€

But that differentiation bothered one lawmaker who argued that the media shouldnโ€™t be treated any differently.  

โ€œThese are the people’s records,โ€ said Sen. Byron Pelton, R-Sterling.

He said there are so many new ways to communicate information to the public, like through podcasts that anyone can produce and publish with their smartphone, that itโ€™s uncomfortable territory to start defining what is professional news media.ย 

โ€œI just cannot get past the media part of it,โ€ said Pelton, who was the lone โ€˜noโ€™ vote on the bill.

The bill further codifies an erosion in public access to government that has been growing for years in Colorado as cash-strapped governments essentially stopped treating the maintenance and provision of public documents as a core function. Today, requesting records is routinely treated as a service for a fee in the state. 

Advocates for government records noted during testimony on the bill, that fees for reviewing and providing records, now set at more than $40 an hour, already limit public scrutiny of governmentโ€™s inner workings.

โ€œThat’s a significant barrier all by itself,โ€ said Jeff Roberts, executive director of the Colorado Freedom of Information Coalition. โ€œWhich is why governments don’t need a reason to take longer to process CORA requests.โ€

The Daily Sun-Up podcast | More episodes

There are aspects of the bill that had wide support: like requiring governments to clearly state how to file records requests and requiring governments that accept credit card payments for other services to accept credit card payments for records. Some governments still require a check to be mailed.

The bill would also increase costs and extend deadlines on businesses that wish to use public records for commercial gain.

But it was the provision, carving out the news media from some of the new restrictions, like extended response deadlines, that sparked the most testimony in opposition.

โ€œTransparency is the cornerstone of healthy civic engagement, it is our collective responsibility,โ€ said Natalie Menten, a former RTD board director, and advocate for public records. โ€œCitizens should not be discriminated against.โ€

This story was produced by the Capitol News Alliance, a collaboration between KUNC News, Colorado Public Radio, Rocky Mountain PBS and The Colorado Sun, and shared with Rocky Mountain Community Radio and other news organizations across the state. Funding for the Alliance is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

Type of Story: News Service

Produced externally by an organization we trust to adhere to high journalistic standards.

Ben Markus is an investigative reporter for Colorado Public Radio. His work is shared with The Colorado Sun through the Colorado Capitol News Alliance.